Quarterly Literary Review Singapore
Issue illustration


Current Issue:
Vol. 2 No. 1 Oct 2002

Site Map


QLRS sections
Short Stories
Extra Media
The Acid Tongue
QLRS general

About Us
Contributors' Notes
Mailing List
Site Map


Gopal Baratham: A Retrospective
Page 2

Nonetheless, I must admit I was surprised by how stinging A Candle or the Sun was, although I did read the book looking for specific targets. The protagonist of the book is Hernie Perera, the manager of the furniture department of Benson’s store, who writes stories in his free time. The book traces his life’s collapse, one of the reasons for which is a “street paper” that begins to appear, and about which he eventually betrays his lover to the authorities (represented by Samson Alagaratnam, an old friend and government official). The “street paper” is a very specific indictment of the culture of compliance in Singapore, denouncing the exchange of the right to freedom of expression and assembly for “good housing, safe streets, schools for your children and … enough [pay] for three square meals a day and a colour TV.” It was full of references to PAP policy, such as “Your masters kennel you in neat boxes, doctor your females, control litter size according to pedigree and tell you what names you can give your pups.” More telling was the portrayal of the overreaction of the authorities in the novel to the relatively harmless source of this “subversion”, a Christian sect of young people called the Children of the Book (of which Hernie’s lover Su-May is a member) and their (ab)use of the incident to further other political ends.

But beyond such specific targets, it is the issue of compromise that Baratham explores in A Candle or the Sun that continues to resonate today. The book does not just criticise a repressive political climate; state restriction does not directly affect most of the characters. It is their willingness to “concede” to the might of the state and sacrifice not just principles, but people, that taints most people. One might say Baratham condemns compromise but not the compromisers. Although in these portraits Baratham still depends on caricature and the satiric mode, but here he is more successful in creating more complex characters. The protagonist of the book, Hernie Perera, is not a noble or exceptional person – one might say none of his characters are – and never really becomes one. In that sense he is recognisable; when his undemanding job at a department store is threatened by managerial changes he readily accepts an old friend’s offer of a job at the Ministry of Culture despite an acute awareness of the necessary costs. About these he remarks laconically, “I suppose this loss of self-respect is what distressed me. It must be something that all whores grappled with” and tries to “compartmentalise” his life and resolve the dissonance between job requirements and security. However, in the end his betrayal is not really political – we never see him forced to write propaganda it is a desire to get back at Su-May for planning to leave him to do good in Africa that provokes him into betraying her and her group. Yet his loyalties waver, and this sees him eventually choosing to help Su-May and her friend Peter Yu (the leader of the Children of the Book and organiser of the street papers) escape. And in his willingness to sacrifice security and suffer for their escape, there is redemption. As with the stories, Baratham’s vision of the human condition contains some hope.

After the publication of the book, Baratham became an outspoken critic of the government, doing so largely with impunity unlike writer Catherine Lim, whose two Straits Times articles in 1994 caused Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong to declare that his authority should not be challenged by “writers on the fringe.” A 1996 Asiaweek article on “political gadflies” in Asia described Baratham as having been “luckier” with state response to his views; in the article, he was stoic about being seen as “the government’s token liberal”. This article also contains a good summary of his reasons for what he does:

“It's not that I want to irritate, but I just speak my mind,” he says. “You should criticize the faults if you care for the society. ”

In a way he had come to terms with the system – an article on censorship in the “killed” issue of Commentary in 1994 showed that he had already accepted that there will be a “boundary within which artists can operate”, symbolised by a circle. Yet he called for a circle “maybe not with very sharp edges”, together with “a second, outer circle, reflecting the ideal that ‘there is a grey but unlimited area into which art must expand: an infinite penumbra’”. Presumably he also applied this model to anyone wanting greater freedom of expression; he himself would continue pushing OB (out-of-bounds) markers in many ways.

The Caning of Michael Fay, which Baratham published in 1994, showed some of these developments in his views. It is a detailed and compassionate study of the issues surrounding the Michael Fay incident in 1994, and in this book, Baratham examines Singapore’s restrictive legislation together with so-called American liberal values. It is a comprehensive and impassioned reflection on justice and the need for humanity in a pragmatic system. Moreover, the interviews he conducted of people ranging from Fay’s parents to an ex-chief flogger from the Prison Department of the Singapore Police Force reflect a belief in the pluralism of truth that resurfaces in later pieces. One assumes that it is in this spirit that he wrote to The Straits Times Forum page in 1997 questioning the objectivity of national education, especially regarding the 1962 Referendum. “I would rather our youth find out the facts from as many sources as are available and be given the option of making up their own minds,” he wrote. This sparked off a fierce exchange of letters on the Referendum and related issues between Mohamad Maidin, Parliamentary Secretary for Education, and Dr Lee Siew Choh, who was the last secretary-general of the Barisan Sosialis (an opposition party of the past).

In Baratham’s last years, he continued to resist conformity by showing public support for fairly unpopular causes. When To Be Free: Stories from Asia’s Struggles Against Oppression by Dr Chee Soon Juan came out, he reviewed it for Asiaweek in 1999. Dr Chee is the leader of one of the few opposition parties here – the Singapore Democratic Party; he currently faces lawsuits by the leaders of the PAP for making unsubstantiated statements during election campaigning last year. To Be Free was not reviewed in Singapore and was not carried by major bookshops here. Baratham went on to attend the “Abolish ISA” event at Hong Lim Park (also the location of the government-designated “Speakers’ Corner”) organised by Dr Chee on International Human Rights Day 2000, where he spoke out against the ISA and the 22-year imprisonment of Chia Thye Poh, Singapore's longest serving political prisoner.

In the light of all this, the death of Gopal Baratham feels like less of a loss to local literature than to critical discourse in Singapore. The Straits Times lauded him as a “free spirit” when reporting his death; since we can never know how many more occasions he might have spoken up but refrained, I shall not use the same title. But it is crucial to mark the passing of one who was not afraid to speak up in favour of letting contesting voices tell their stories. In a feature in the Singapore Medical Journal titled “A Book I’d Recommend to a Colleague”, Baratham recommends Truth: A History and a Guide for the Perplexed by Felipe Fernandez-Armesto. He ends his article with: “...those who have found and believe they have a monopoly of the truth reside in lunatic asylums or in the palatial edifices that tyrants build for themselves.” Both his public criticisms and his books were ways of subverting a system that so often seeks to monopolise the truth. In a city where forgetting becomes easier and easier with each new building and monument and policy change, Gopal Baratham’s contribution to Singapore debate and memory is something that cannot be forgotten.


by Gopal Baratham

Short story collections:

- Figments of Experience - People Make You Cry - Memories that Glow in the Dark - The City of Forgetting (edited and with an introduction by Ban Kah Choon)


- A Candle or the Sun (Serpent’s Tail, London; 1991) - Sayang (Times Books International, Singapore; 1991) - Moonrise, Sunset (Serpent’s Tail, London;1995)


- The Caning of Michael Fay (KRP Publications, Singapore; 1994)

[Page 1 | Page 2]

QLRS Vol. 2 No. 1 Oct 2002


About Teng Qian Xi
Mail the editors

Return to Vol. 2 No. 1 Oct 2002

  Other Essay in this Issue

The Ink of Diverse Gods
By Alice Mendoza.

Related Links

Report on Gopal Baratham's death
External link to GetForMe.

Chronology of Gopal Baratham's life and work
External link to GetForMe.

Straits Times Forum letter, 22 May 1997
External link to Asiaone.

A Book I'd Recommend To A Colleague
External link to the Singapore Medical Association.

Gopal Baratham's review of To Be Free
External link.

Today article on the 'Abolish ISA' event
External link to ThinkCentre.

'Liberalising the Arts' by Koh Buck Song
External link.

Asiaweek article on dissent
External link to Asiaweek.


Return to QLRS home

Copyright © 2002 The Authors
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | E-mail